To a layman, labels may just seem like sticky pieces of paper that enable one to easily mark an item – usually for shipment or storage. Beyond the size of the label, no consideration may be given to its quality, the type of adhesive used or the simple fact that not all labels are suitable – or secure enough – for all labeling scenarios.
That may be okay if you’re printing labels for personal use. But oversimplifying the label selection process can spell trouble for businesses. Especially when it comes to thermal transfer printing – which is the method used to produce approximately half of all labels used in enterprise, industrial and even small business environments.
See, the printer is often deemed the primary determinant of a printing solution’s performance. And printer performance certainly matters a great deal, as we’ve talked about before here on the Your Edge and I will revisit again in a minute. However, the printer is just one component of the printing solution and therefore just one influence on the quality of your printing solution’s output.
Honestly, the printer isn’t even the first thing you should really think about when you start shopping for a printing solution. Your focus should be on the labeling application.
Labels do more than just store data.
Whether specific to inventory management or the “track and trace” of assets, sales or shipments, that label or tag being printed is designed to facilitate accountability through real-time visibility into asset status. They also improve productivity. Workers can get more done in less time when labels consistently print, adhere and scan properly throughout their intended life cycles. But your labeling application can fail to perform as needed if your labels are failing.
When many companies shop for their label/tag printing solution, they assume that all components of that solution will remain viable until the printer reaches end of life. The labels included. Yet, I’ve realized through conversations with customers and colleagues that one of two things typically happen:
1. The labels initially purchased were appropriate for the application – at the time. But the customer has never re-evaluated the selection since. The company simply continues to re-order those exact same supplies until it’s time to upgrade the printer, which could be 5-7 years later, as long as no major issues arise. This stems from a belief that change is risky. (Yet, failing to change can be just as risky.)
2. Customers point to the printer as the point of failure when labels don’t come out to their quality standards, not realizing that the printing supplies such as the labels themselves could be the culprit. All the while, they continue using the same labels/tags they’ve always used.
In each of these scenarios, we usually come to the same conclusion after close evaluation of the company’s “solution”: they are not using the right label for the application right now.
That’s because there are thousands of types of thermal labels alone, each customized to ensure that it will work as it should despite the environmental elements it will encounter. (Ruggedness is not a descriptive term exclusively reserved for hardware such as handheld mobile computers, tablets, scanners and printers.)
Plus, the labels needed for manufacturing, warehousing and distribution environments will likely vary greatly from retail, healthcare or field service environments. Even within each of those vertical sectors, there is tremendous variation in labeling applications. For example, within automotive supply chains alone, both barcode and RFID labels may be needed to tag, track and trace everything from pallets of raw materials to the thousands of individual parts arriving from suppliers – ranging from metal screws in bins to wire harnesses – as well as the finished vehicles rolling off the line. That means that, as a supplier to an automotive manufacturer, you may need to apply dozens of different types of labels and tags on the products you’re shipping out to the factory depending on each manufacturer’s specific labeling requirements.
And that’s just one example. Most supply chain organizations require multi-faceted labeling strategies and printing solutions to support the many different types of products they process, their palletization tracking requirements and the technologies used to track and trace assets. The printing system design – and supplies requirements – for a shipping label application can vary greatly from a precision-based, small-label application, even if both are used within the same facility. There are also compliance requirements around government regulations and industry mandates.
Don’t forget that your label selection also impacts printer performance and the total cost of ownership (TCO) for your entire printing solution. For example, ensuring that you’re using the best quality label available can help to prevent adhesive buildup on printer parts and premature printhead failures. It also helps to reduce frequent label reprints, which lead to frequent reorders and wasteful spending. Of course, using the right supplies for your labeling application also minimizes printing mishaps that disrupt operations on a massive scale.
The takeaway?
You should be constantly re-assessing your label/tag selection. Ideally, every couple of years. That way you don’t waste any money on incompatible or insufficient supplies for your current application requirements.
Whether ordering labels for a completely new application or re-ordering for the same application a tenth time, the only way to confidently select the right labels and tags is to first list out your application mandates, environmental considerations and the overall workflow/asset flow. Then complete a “printing solution” requirements checklist for each application. From a label perspective, it should cover things such as:
From a printer perspective, you will need to consider the “speeds and feeds” of your workflow to start:
That’s a lot of information to process, right? We’re not done yet. Other things to consider:
Mind you, this list of questions is not exhaustive for either the hardware or supplies considerations that must be made related to printing. There are dozens more. I just want to demonstrate how complex it can be to build a printing solution that will fully support the labeling applications that quite literally dictate the speed and performance of your business output.
But don’t worry: my team and I will help you navigate each of those decisions over the next several months here on Your Edge. In fact, I’ll be back here on Your Edge next month with a blog talking about the role that ribbons play in your printing solution.
Before I sign off, though, let me leave you with a final stat to ponder:
So, you have a right to know the real impact that (not-so-simple) decisions about labels, ribbons, inlays and more have on the return on investment (ROI) for your printer – and the performance of your entire printing solution.
###
Tune back into Your Edge in November to see what Craig reveals about how much your printer ribbon regulates the “speeds and feeds” of your labeling solution.
Craig Swanson is Senior Director of Product Management for the Supplies Business Unit at Zebra Technologies. He is responsible for the strategy and management of Zebra’s supplies portfolio across the globe. The supplies portfolio consists of specialty label materials, RFID labels, thermal transfer ribbons and thermal & laser printable wristbands.
Prior to this role, Mr. Swanson has held a variety of progressive management positions at Zebra, including Supplies Product Manager, Industry Marketing Manager, Senior Business Development Manager and Senior Manager for Channel Strategy, Operations & Alliances. Prior to joining, he spent six years with Rittenhouse Paper Company, where he held various product management positions within its label and ribbon divisions.
Mr. Swanson received a bachelor’s degree in business administration from Marquette University, a master’s degree in business administration from Keller Graduate School of Management and was awarded an Executive Scholar Certificate from Kellogg School of Management. He currently serves on the Board of Directors for Spring of Life Partnership Habitat for Humanity.